Still ridiculous! |
At the core of West Ham's problems is the lack of stability in defence. What we would give for a defender who can play in the centre or at right back and who has positional sense and tackling as his main attributes. Tonks may not be so great at flying down the wing but he proved last year that he brings stability and cohesion to the defence. His versatility would also allow for consistency in defensive personnel.
Tomkins allegedly departed because the club couldn't guarantee him a starting spot - ironically, our injury problems have meant that he would have played in the vast majority of our games to date! At £10 million the club imagined they were getting a decent deal. Now we are constantly rumoured to be in the market for another centre back - at what price one wonders?
And then there's the identity issue - letting one of our dyed in the wool Hammers leave was truly bonkers as we faced an identity-testing move to a new stadium. Superslav says we lack dedication and intensity - hardly attributes that Tomkins could ever be accused of lacking.
While some might suggest that Tomkins would be unlikely to move back so soon, here's one Hammer who suspects that it's part of his long-term plan and with all the nonsense these days with agent, we all know that a player who wants to leave will depart no matter what their contract says.
Sadly, Hammers fans are likely to embrace that reality in the near future in respect of Mr Payet.
So, it's time to beak the news to Palace that we want our boomerang back, and soon!
Yes it's important to get the best players possible but it's the managers job to gel the the team and get the best out of them not happening Everyone keeps saying it's the same team as last year not so no Moses Sako Jenkinson CarrolL over a third of that team gone just making a point
ReplyDeleteGreat readingg this
ReplyDelete